Epistemology example的問題,透過圖書和論文來找解法和答案更準確安心。 我們找到下列線上看、影評和彩蛋懶人包

Epistemology example的問題,我們搜遍了碩博士論文和台灣出版的書籍,推薦寫的 The Matrix of Stem Cell Research: An Approach to Rethinking Science in Society 和Stumpf, Carl的 Tone Psychology: The Sensation of Two Simultaneous Tones都 可以從中找到所需的評價。

這兩本書分別來自 和所出版 。

國立臺灣科技大學 數位學習與教育研究所 翁楊絲茜所指導 Dani Puspitasari的 印尼網路社交媒體用戶之認知信念、數位素養和社交媒體參與度三方之關係建模及對教育的實際影響 (2021),提出Epistemology example關鍵因素是什麼,來自於Internet epistemic belief、Digital literacy、Social media engagement、social media users、online users、education implication。

而第二篇論文淡江大學 英文學系博士班 蔡振興所指導 陳映華的 現代時間與自然:艾略特與懷海德 (2021),提出因為有 自然哲學、四首四重奏、艾蜜莉‧海爾、第四維時空、認識論、事件、綿延、擴延、創生進程、瞬時性、共時性、相對論、光、因果性、超級 / 量子電腦、普魯福洛克、集合理論、阿岡本、薛丁格、疊加態、時間之箭 / 熵的重點而找出了 Epistemology example的解答。

接下來讓我們看這些論文和書籍都說些什麼吧:

除了Epistemology example,大家也想知道這些:

The Matrix of Stem Cell Research: An Approach to Rethinking Science in Society

為了解決Epistemology example的問題,作者 這樣論述:

Christine Hauskeller is Professor of Philosophy, teaching philosophy of science, bioethics, and feminist theory at the University of Exeter, UK. She conducts empirical philosophical studies on the processes of knowledge production in the life sciences and their intersections with different forms of

valuation and normativity. Prof Hauskeller has published widely on stem cell research for the past twenty years and has led many projects on the subject area. Appointments to advisory and governance boards include the UK BBSRC Science and Society Panel, and the German Federal Government’s Central Et

hics Committee Stem Cell Research.Arne Manzeschke is Professor of Anthropology and Ethics at the Lutheran University of Applied Sciences Nuremberg, Germany, Director of the Institute of Ethics and Anthropology in Health Care, President of Societas Ethica, European Society for research in ethics, and

he is vice chairman of the Bavarian Ethics Commission on Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis. Arne was a member of ForIPS - Bavarian Research Network Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells. He conducts ethical research in the field of bioethics and the ethics of technology, especially digitalization and the

human-machine-interaction. Anja Pichl is a doctoral student at Bielefeld University, Germany, in the DFG research training group 2073 Integrating Ethics and Epistemology of Scientific Research. Her dissertation investigates the limits of biological knowledge using the example of stem cell research.

Together with Arne Manzeschke she organized an international and interdisciplinary summer school on pluripotent stem cells in 2015, funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF).

印尼網路社交媒體用戶之認知信念、數位素養和社交媒體參與度三方之關係建模及對教育的實際影響

為了解決Epistemology example的問題,作者Dani Puspitasari 這樣論述:

如今,社交媒體的參與已成為我們社會的一部分,特別是很熱衷於科技的年輕世代。現在網際網路已成為最容易獲取資訊的地方,我們輕而易舉就能找到我們所想要的資訊。在社群媒體的使用人數日益增長的同時,網路上也出現了不少虛假的資訊導致使用者分不清真假。人們之所以存有特定信念是因為認知本身是一種依賴形式,會存在於我們所在的環境中而變化。 本研究開發了一份問卷,包含三十三個施測項目,用以探究社群媒體用戶之認知信念、數位素養和社群媒體參與三個變數的關係。本研究採用滾雪球取樣法進行調查,以來自印尼371名的參與者作為本研究的施測對象。本研究從CFA分析產生了5樣因素,並透過SEM分析總結出一個模型。在網路認知信念

和尋求支持的意圖,是商業參與的重要預測因素。雖然知識正確性顯著預測了使用者商業參與和尋求支持的意圖,但就數位素養作為導入媒介的新聞參與方面,其成為負面預測因素。 第三個網路認知信念方面是部分由數位素養作為導入媒介的知識來源,以尋求支持意圖和新聞參與。然而,它是一個預測商業參與的負面預測因素。這項研究指出教師藉由提供各種資訊與討論,以辨別網路資訊的偏差性,來建立網路認知信念。教師與其阻止或限制網路的資訊,更應該建立個開放性討論的論壇,以用來檢視網路資訊的質量,並再次確認資訊的正確性。

Tone Psychology: The Sensation of Two Simultaneous Tones

為了解決Epistemology example的問題,作者Stumpf, Carl 這樣論述:

Carl Stumpf (1848-1936) was a German philosopher and psychologist and a visionary and important academic. During his lifetime, he ranked among the most prominent scientists of his time. Stumpf's intention, as evident in his book, Tone Psychology, was to investigate the phenomenon of tone sensation i

n order to understand the general psychic functions and processes underlying the perception of sound and music. It could be argued that modern music psychology has lost or perhaps ignored the epistemological basis that Carl Stumpf developed in his Tone Psychology. To gain a confident psychological b

asis, the relevance of Stumpf's deliberations on music psychology cannot be overestimated. Analyses of the essence of tones, complex tones and sounds are fundamental topics for general psychology and epistemology. By the end of this two volume work, Stumpf had established an epistemology of hearing.

The subject of Volume I is the sensation of successive single tones. With almost mathematical stringency, Stumpf developed a topology of tones. Volume II deals with the sensation of two simultaneous tones, where different degrees of fusion can be heard depending on the interval. Tonal fusion is the

tendency of consonant intervals to sound like an entity, whereas dissonant intervals do not fuse very much. But in spite of fusion of the two interval tones to a single interval sensation, both tones can be distinguished. This is easier for less consonant intervals than for highly consonant interva

ls, such as the octave. Thus, the degree of consonance corresponds to the degree of tonal fusion. All these investigations are complemented by vast discussions on the psychic and physical preconditions of tone and interval sensations, for example direct and indirect sensory judgements, application o

f indirect criterions, individuality of sense and memory, attention, practice, tiredness, measurability and reliability, the concept of infinity and steadiness of the tonal area, timbre, roughness, combination tones and so forth. The detailed descriptions of experiments, series of tests and test str

ategies show clearly that Stumpf was an excellent and pioneering methodologist and experimenter in the field of psychological tests. The books are stimulating, rewarding and provocative and will appeal to music psychologists, music theorists, general psychologists, philosophers, epistemologists and

neuroscientists.

現代時間與自然:艾略特與懷海德

為了解決Epistemology example的問題,作者陳映華 這樣論述:

本論文嘗試以自然哲學的視角閱讀艾略特(Thomas Stearn Eliot)的《四首四重奏》、《透明人》,以及《阿爾弗瑞德‧普魯弗洛克的情歌》等作品。透過科學的角度,本論文希冀處理艾略特詩中的兩個重要主題:現代時間與自然。十九世紀前的科學著作,如:笛卡兒(René Descartes)、牛頓(Isaac Newton)、湯瑪斯‧楊(Thomas Young)等,皆以自然哲學稱之。科學對他們而言,是關乎自然和宇宙的哲學。此外,時間與光的研究密不可分。本論將時間分為兩個路線探討:光有多快及光有多小?我將它們對時間產生的影響力拿來解決艾略特《四首四重奏》中的時間問題:(一) 〈焚毀的諾頓〉代表時

間的靜止與瞬時性。(二)〈東科克〉不斷環繞著開始即結束、而結束便是開始的概念。(三)〈乾燥的薩爾維吉斯〉描述一個疊加態(superposition)的世 界,一個量子力學的初始狀態。 (四)〈小吉丁〉闡述在微觀下的自然,光子(photon)的傳播特性顯示時間在第四度空間以上倒流的可能性,瓦解牛頓(Isaac Newton)的時間觀。  論文共分為三章。第一章爬梳懷海德(Alfred North Whitehead)如何分析笛卡兒(René Descartes)、洛克(John Locke)、牛頓、愛因斯坦在哲學及科學的介紹為伊始,作為閱讀艾略特詩作的導言。第二章由科學角度看時間觀念的變化,從普

遍認定的牛頓三維線性時間觀:空間即空間、時間即時間的概念,跨越到愛因斯坦以降的時間觀:藉光速影響時間及其扭曲空間的能力,將時間增視為三度空間的第四個坐標系,使〈焚毀的諾頓〉和〈東科克〉具可行性。在此,時間是相對的,而光速為一常數(constant)。第三章就量子力學中,微觀下光子的特性:1) 光在波粒二相性(wave-particle duality)中的疊加態、2)光子的傳播違背線性時間因果關係(causality)來閱讀〈乾燥的薩爾維吉斯〉、〈小吉丁〉和《阿爾弗瑞德‧普魯弗洛克的情歌》。本章將普魯弗洛克視為一 擁有強大計算能力的超級/量子電腦,他將自身置於疊加態之奇想,在做出選擇前,藉著對

波函數(wave function)坍塌機率的計算,臆想諸多其他角色的可能性。 另外,論文提及艾略特重要信件公開及詩中時間可行性的科學佐證。信件方面,我提到關於西元2020年在普林斯頓大學圖書館公開的,艾略特給艾蜜莉‧海爾(Emily Hale)的1131封信及同年在哈佛大學公開的艾略特聲明信及其意義。科學佐證方面,包含:1) 太空人雙胞胎之一——史考特‧凱利(Scott Kelly)在太空旅行中,染色體中的端粒(telomere)變長,代表時間可能可以倒流。2)在量子力學的微觀狀態下,熱力學中向來視為不可隨時間遞減的時間之箭/熵(time’s arrow / entropy)卻在疊加態

中遞減。在此不但作為光子具有違反時間能力的證明,也同時證明艾略特詩中的時間描述,就二十一世紀角度來說,是有科學根據的。 在結論中,本論文作者藉由觀察二維世界生物——螞蟻眼中的世界,對比三維世界的人類眼中所見之巨大差異,解釋懷海德時間觀中的綿延(duration)為覺察事件(event)的能力,擴延(extension)為統合相關事件並產生意義的能力。觀察低維度宇宙的方式,或能對較高維度中既存的巨大差異,有更多的理解。另外,光的疊加態或許能理解成宇宙法則劃定前的階段。在此完全符合艾略特的信仰觀。如創世記一章三節道,『神說:「要有光。」就有了光。』光與暗物質相互定義彼此。