Inductive thematic a的問題，透過圖書和論文來找解法和答案更準確安心。 我們找到下列線上看、影評和彩蛋懶人包

The Socio-Literary Imaginary in 19th and 20th Century Britain: Victorian and Edwardian Inflections

為了解決Inductive thematic a的問題，作者 這樣論述：

At once an invitation and a provocation, The Socio-Literary Imaginary represents the first collection of essays to illuminate the historically and intellectually complex relationship between literary studies and sociology in nineteenth and early twentieth-century Britain. During the ongoing emergenc

e of what Thomas Carlyle, in "Signs of the Times" (1829), pejoratively labeled a new "Mechanical Age," Britain's robust tradition of social thought was transformed by professionalization, institutionalization, and the birth of modern disciplinary fields. Writers and thinkers most committed to an app

roach grounded in empirical data and inductive reasoning, such as Harriet Martineau and John Stuart Mill, positioned themselves in relation to French positivist Auguste Comte's recent neologism "la　 sociologie." Some Victorian and Edwardian novelists, George Eliot and John Galsworthy among them, bec

ame enthusiastic adopters of early sociological theory; others, including Charles Dickens and Ford Madox Ford, more　 idiosyncratically both complemented and competed with the "systems of society" proposed by their social scientific contemporaries. Chronologically bound within the period from the 183

0s through the 1920s, this volume expansively reconstructs their expansive if never collective efforts. Individual essays focus on Comte, Dickens, Eliot, Ford, and Galsworthy, as well as Friedrich Engels, Elizabeth Gaskell, G. H. Lewes, Virginia Woolf, and others. The volume's introduction locates t

hese author-specific contributions in the context of both the international intellectual history of sociology in Britain through the First World War and the interanimating intersections of sociological and literary　 theory from the work of Hippolyte Taine in the 1860s through the successive linguist

ic and digital turns of the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries. Maria K. Bachman is Professor of English at Middle Tennessee State University. She is co-editor of Fear, Loathing, and Victorian Xenophobia (The Ohio State University Press, 2013), Reality’s Dark Light: The Sensational Wi

lke Collins (University of Tennessee Press, 2003), Wilkie Collins’s　The Woman in White　and　Blind Love (Broadview Press, 2006, 2004) and editor of Wilkie Collins’s ＂The Dead Hand＂ and Charles Dickens’s ＂The Bride’s Chamber＂ (University of Tampa Press, 2009). She has also published numerous critical a

rticles and book chapters on Victorian and Edwardian literature and culture and is co-editor of the Victorians Institute Journal.Albert D. Pionke is the William and Margaret Going Endowed Professor of English at The University of Alabama. He is the author of Plots of Opportunity: Representing Conspi

racy in Victorian England (Ohio State University Press, 2004), The Ritual Culture of Victorian Professionals: Competing for Ceremonial Status, 1838-1877 (Ashgate, 2013; Routledge 2016), and Teaching Later British Literature: A Thematic Approach (Anthem, 2019); the co-editor of Victorian Secrecy: Eco

nomies of Knowledge and Concealment (Ashgate 2010; Routledge, 2016) and Thomas Carlyle and the Idea of Influence (Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 2018); and the founding director and principal investigator of Mill Marginalia Online (millmarginalia.org).

Organizational Interoperability in E-Government: Lessons from 77 European Good-Practice Cases

為了解決Inductive thematic a的問題，作者Kubicek, Herbert,Cimander, Ralf,Scholl, Hans Jochen 這樣論述：

In the e-government research community as well as in many national e-government programs, interoperability is widely seen as a key factor in developing effective and attractive e-services. There is also agreement that interoperability encompasses not only mere technical standards and interfaces,

but also includes organizational, legal, and cultural aspects. Several interoperability frameworks have been introduced on national and international levels, and recommendations have been made for the adaptation of enterprise architectures in the public sector.Common to all these approaches is their

top-down deductive procedure, which does not connect very well to the real world of e-government projects. In contrast, in this volume, which is based on empirical research, the authors introduce a bottom-up inductive approach to deal with the challenges of interoperability-related governance. Base

d on so-called ＂good-practice＂ cases of interoperability in e-government, they derive concepts and classifications that help to uncover and assess similarities and differences between the cases. As a result, they present an empirically based conceptual framework that details the options for IT gover

nance of interoperability in government. In addition, their findings also make it possible to critically assess and improve other existing frameworks.With this work, which combines different thematic foci as well as a European and a US background the authors situate empirical results in the broader

context of theoretical and political reflection. Thus they provide insights into strategic choices for CIOs in e-government at a national or regional level, experiences and lessons learned for managers and developers in e-government projects, and a huge set of empirical data for administrative and p

olitical scientists.

學術話語社會化: 英語非母語國際學生在台灣修讀英文碩士課程的感知困難

為了解決Inductive thematic a的問題，作者安禢 這樣論述：

高等教育國際化在外擴圈國家中迅速發展，在這些國家求學的非英語母語國際學生的數量也隨之增加，台灣的全英語授課學程就是一個例子。非英語母語國際學生須能社會化地應用口頭和書面的學術話語，以實現他們的學術目標。然而，在全英語授課的教育環境中，要能社會化的應用學術話語是一個複雜的過程，因此，非英語母語國際學生常面臨許多的挑戰和困難。儘管文獻已有一些研究探討國際學生在學術話語社會化過程中遭遇的困難，但大多數此類研究並非在全英語授課環境中進行，更少有研究是針對台灣全英語授課學程的碩士生。因此，本研究旨在探討在台灣就讀全英語授課碩士學位學程的國際學生在學術話語社會化過程中遭遇的困難及挑戰。本訪談研究招募了來

自五個不同國家，就讀於人文、社會科學和自然科學學門的九名非英語母語國際研究生為訪談對象，並採用主題分析法進行質性資料分析。研究結果顯示，非英語母語學生在從事口頭和書面的學術任務時都遭遇到語言和與任務相關的困難，但心理層面的困難只出現在學生進行口語任務時。依據研究結果，此論文亦提出教學建議，並討論了研究限制及未來的研究方向。