French nuclear power的問題，透過圖書和論文來找解法和答案更準確安心。 我們找到下列線上看、影評和彩蛋懶人包

The Politics of Command

為了解決French nuclear power的問題，作者Freedman, Lawrence 這樣論述：

Using examples from a wide variety of conflicts, Lawrence Freedman shows that successful military command depends on the ability not only to use armed forces effectively but also to understand the political context in which they are operating.Command in war is about forging effective strategies a

nd implementing them, making sure that orders are appropriate, well-communicated, and then obeyed. But it is also an intensely political process. This is largely because how wars are fought depends to a large extent on how their aims are set. It is also because commanders in one realm must possess t

he ability to work with other command structures, including those of other branches of the armed forces and allies. In Command, Lawrence Freedman explores the importance of political as well as operational considerations in command with a series of eleven vivid case studies, all taken from the perio

d after 1945. Over this period, the risks of nuclear escalation led to a shift away from great power confrontations and towards civil wars, and advances in communication technologies made it easier for higher-level commanders to direct their subordinates. Freedman covers defeats as well as victories

. Pakistani generals tried to avoid surrender as they were losing the eastern part of their country to India in 1971. Iraq’s Saddam Hussein turned his defeats into triumphant narratives of victory. Osama bin Laden escaped the Americans in Afghanistan in 2001. The UK struggled as a junior partner to

the US in Iraq after 2003. We come across insubordinate generals, such as Israel’s Arik Sharon, and those in the French army in Algeria, so frustrated with their political leadership that they twice tried to change it. At the other end of the scale, Che Guevara in Congo in 1966 and Igor Girkin in Uk

raine in 2014 both tried to spark local wars to suit their grandiose objectives. Freedman ends the book with a meditation on the future of command in a world that is becoming increasingly reliant on technologies like artificial intelligence. A wide-ranging and insightful history of the changing natu

re of command in the postwar era, this will stand as a definitive account of a foundational concept in both military affairs and politics.

French nuclear power進入發燒排行的影片

美國川普政府對中國科技戰之研究-以華為公司為例

為了解決French nuclear power的問題，作者楊中元 這樣論述：

美國總統川普自2018年起以國家安全為由，陸續對中國發起科技制裁，以採取全政府的遏制戰略，透過行政、立法、司法等機構制定技術、人員、投資等一系列限制措施，並聯合盟國對中國華為公司進行科技圍堵。由於5G通訊技術被稱為下一代工業革命的核心，結合大數據、雲端、物聯網、人工智慧等，在未來經濟、軍事領域具有革命性影響力。而華為5G在此一領域專利數、市佔率、產業鍵等皆具世界領先優勢，基此，本文檢視美國川普政府運用政治、經濟、法律、外交等手段，對中國華為進行全方位遏制所產生的影響。本文發現在美國川普政府的各項遏制政策中，以「出口管制」及「外交圍堵」政策具有相當成效，「限制人員交流」政策次之，「限制中國對美

國投資」政策再次之。另外，由於美國對華為的制裁，亦導致全球半導體產業走向區域化，鑑此，台灣應及早因應及擬定預備方案，以強化整體半導體產業與多元發展。

Star Power: Iter and the International Quest for Fusion Energy

為了解決French nuclear power的問題，作者Bécoulet, Alain 這樣論述：

Alain Bécoulet is Head of Engineering for ITER, an international nuclear fusion research and engineering demonstration project in France. Previously, he was Director of the French Magnetic Fusion Research Institute.

情緒對外交決策之影響：以韓戰期間的中共與美國為例

為了解決French nuclear power的問題，作者盧俊昇 這樣論述：

近年來隨著腦神經科學的進步，情緒與理性的二分法觀點已受到挑戰與修正。情緒與理性是不可截然兩分的整體機制，這樣的觀點已然衝擊各個研究領域，帶來一波新的「行為革命」浪潮，當然也為國際關係研究帶來了一波「情感轉向」或「情緒轉向」。從2000年開始，陸陸續續有國際關係學者開始倡議重視情感和情緒的研究，基於這樣一個重要觀念轉折的契機，本文嘗試以這波國際關係「情緒轉向」的研究成果，來探討情緒在韓戰的決策過程中扮演一個怎樣的角色。主流國際關係對於戰爭的分析，多半是建立在理性計算的現實主義視角上。理性選擇理論熱衷於把理性和自利的假設，廣泛運用於政治行為的研究中；但個體不可能全盤掌握到最佳可行決策中所需的全部

資訊，顯然人們不是完全的理性，自然也就無法達到經濟學中「效用最大化」的這一目標。換句話說，人是會犯錯的，會受到各種內在與外部因素的影響，進而做出各種不理性的決策，所以情緒也可能是影響決策者的重要因素之一。本論文採質化研究，以論述分析與個案研究做為主要核心研究方法，並透過Todd H. Hall的三種情緒性論述分析(情緒性陳述論述、情緒性挑釁論述與情緒性論述)，來分析韓戰期間美國與中共在決策過程中，是否受到情緒影響而做出不理性的決策。最後本文研究發現，無論是威權國家或是民主國家，其國內政治的激情往往會導致決策者上喪失在實際戰場上的理性判斷。從韓戰中美雙方的分析中可以發現，國家決策者與戰場指揮官的

判斷往往不一致：不論是美軍或是共軍的最終決策者，最終均決定聽從政治的激情而非戰場實際的情況。此可彰顯本文的論點：政治激情往往會凌駕於理性決策之上，進而做出不理性的決策。