Immunize的問題，透過圖書和論文來找解法和答案更準確安心。 我們找到下列線上看、影評和彩蛋懶人包

Think Again: The Power of Knowing What You Don’’t Know

為了解決Immunize的問題，作者Grant, Adam 這樣論述：

暢銷書《給予：華頓商學院最啟發人心的一堂課》作者 華頓商學院教授亞當．格蘭特又一力作！ 原來我們都不自覺緊抓舊思維不放！ 帶你打開心胸、大膽質疑，擁抱敢於破除成見的積極人生 　　「若想要在家、工作場合、學校等各個地方創造樂於不斷學習的文化，本書絕對為必讀之作。……尤其在這個變化劇烈的時代，本書所點出的觀念更是至關重要。」──比爾．蓋茲與梅琳達‧蓋茲 　　談到影響思考和學習的因素，我們第一個想到的是個人聰明才智，然而在如今這個時代，「反思」與「破除成見」的能力可能更為重要。 　　日常生活中，我們大多安於已知的事物──只聽符合自己想法的意見，視逆耳忠言為愚見，而沒看見從中學習的機會；

只和順我們意的人打交道，卻忽視反對聲浪的可貴。然而事實上，我們相信的事物根本不是那麼地堅不可摧。大多數人盲目捍衛自以為絕對正確的信念，真正追求事實真相的人寥寥無幾──聰明才智不再是良藥，反而隱含劇毒，讓我們停止反思、畫地自限。 　　亞當．格蘭特指出，要改變這個有害的狀態，我們應該學會打開心胸──練習勇敢闡述自己的想法，同時虛心傾聽他人的批評指教。以大膽的觀點和嚴謹的論證，格蘭特帶我們學會如何坦然擁抱犯錯的快樂、從中學習，以及如何加深談話深度，並為學校、工作場域與生活社群打造出一個樂於不斷學習、自我挑戰的環境。 　　如果說知識就是力量，那「不知為不知」就是一種智慧。我們的所見所想，都未必是真

理，擁有反思的能力與開放的心態，才得以掙脫成見的枷鎖，擁有更廣闊的視野，無論是對於職涯發展，或在追求人生其他目標的路上，都能受用無窮。(文/博客來編譯) 　　"Think Again is a must-read for anyone who wants to create a culture of learning and exploration, whether at home, at work, or at school... In an increasingly divided world, the lessons in this book are more important t

han ever." --Bill and Melinda Gates 　　The bestselling author of Give and Take and Originals examines the critical art of rethinking: learning to question your opinions and open other people's minds, which can position you for excellence at work and wisdom in life 　　Intelligence is usually seen as

the ability to think and learn, but in a rapidly changing world, there's another set of cognitive skills that might matter more: the ability to rethink and unlearn. In our daily lives, too many of us favor the comfort of conviction over the discomfort of doubt. We listen to opinions that make us fee

l good, instead of ideas that make us think hard. We see disagreement as a threat to our egos, rather than an opportunity to learn. We surround ourselves with people who agree with our conclusions, when we should be gravitating toward those who challenge our thought process. The result is that our b

eliefs get brittle long before our bones. We think too much like preachers defending our sacred beliefs, prosecutors proving the other side wrong, and politicians campaigning for approval--and too little like scientists searching for truth. Intelligence is no cure, and it can even be a curse: being

good at thinking can make us worse at rethinking. The brighter we are, the blinder to our own limitations we can become. 　　Organizational psychologist Adam Grant is an expert on opening other people's minds--and our own. As Wharton's top-rated professor and the bestselling author of Originals and G

ive and Take, he makes it one of his guiding principles to argue like he's right but listen like he's wrong. With bold ideas and rigorous evidence, he investigates how we can embrace the joy of being wrong, bring nuance to charged conversations, and build schools, workplaces, and communities of life

long learners. You'll learn how an international debate champion wins arguments, a Black musician persuades white supremacists to abandon hate, a vaccine whisperer convinces concerned parents to immunize their children, and Adam has coaxed Yankees fans to root for the Red Sox. Think Again reveals th

at we don't have to believe everything we think or internalize everything we feel. It's an invitation to let go of views that are no longer serving us well and prize mental flexibility over foolish consistency. If knowledge is power, knowing what we don't know is wisdom.   Adam Grant is an organiz

ational psychologist, Wharton’s top-rated professor for seven straight years, and the New York Times bestselling author of three books that have sold over a million copies and been translated into thirty-five languages. He hosts the TED original podcast WorkLife, which in the spring of 2018 reached

#1 on the Apple charts. He has been recognized as one of the world’s ten most influential management thinkers by Thinkers50, Fortune’s 40 under 40, a World Economic Forum Young Global Leader, and he has more than 2.7 million followers on social media. He also curates the Next Big Idea Club along wit

h Susan Cain, Malcolm Gladwell, and Daniel Pink, handpicking two new books each quarter for subscribers and donating 100 percent of profits to provide books for children in under-resourced communities.

Immunize進入發燒排行的影片

Think Again: The Power of Knowing What You Don’t Know

為了解決Immunize的問題，作者 這樣論述：

　　暢銷書《給予：華頓商學院最啟發人心的一堂課》作者 　　華頓商學院教授亞當．格蘭特又一力作！ 　　原來我們都不自覺緊抓舊思維不放！ 　　帶你打開心胸、大膽質疑，擁抱敢於破除成見的積極人生 　　「若想要在家、工作場合、學校等各個地方創造樂於不斷學習的文化，本書絕對為必讀之作。……尤其在這個變化劇烈的時代，本書所點出的觀念更是至關重要。」──比爾．蓋茲與梅琳達‧蓋茲 　　談到影響思考和學習的因素，我們第一個想到的是個人聰明才智，然而在如今這個時代，「反思」與「破除成見」的能力可能更為重要。 　　日常生活中，我們大多安於已知的事物──只聽符合自己想法的意見，視逆耳忠言為愚見，而

沒看見從中學習的機會；只和順我們意的人打交道，卻忽視反對聲浪的可貴。然而事實上，我們相信的事物根本不是那麼地堅不可摧。大多數人盲目捍衛自以為絕對正確的信念，真正追求事實真相的人寥寥無幾──聰明才智不再是良藥，反而隱含劇毒，讓我們停止反思、畫地自限。 　　亞當．格蘭特指出，要改變這個有害的狀態，我們應該學會打開心胸──練習勇敢闡述自己的想法，同時虛心傾聽他人的批評指教。以大膽的觀點和嚴謹的論證，格蘭特帶我們學會如何坦然擁抱犯錯的快樂、從中學習，以及如何加深談話深度，並為學校、工作場域與生活社群打造出一個樂於不斷學習、自我挑戰的環境。 　　如果說知識就是力量，那「不知為不知」就是一種智慧。我們

的所見所想，都未必是真理，擁有反思的能力與開放的心態，才得以掙脫成見的枷鎖，擁有更廣闊的視野，無論是對於職涯發展，或在追求人生其他目標的路上，都能受用無窮。(文/博客來編譯) 　　"Think Again is a must-read for anyone who wants to create a culture of learning and exploration, whether at home, at work, or at school... In an increasingly divided world, the lessons in this book are more

important than ever."--Bill and Melinda Gates 　　The bestselling author of Give and Take and Originals examines the critical art of rethinking: learning to question your opinions and open other people's minds, which can position you for excellence at work and wisdom in life 　　Intelligence is usual

ly seen as the ability to think and learn, but in a rapidly changing world, there's another set of cognitive skills that might matter more: the ability to rethink and unlearn. In our daily lives, too many of us favor the comfort of conviction over the discomfort of doubt. We listen to opinions that

make us feel good, instead of ideas that make us think hard. We see disagreement as a threat to our egos, rather than an opportunity to learn. We surround ourselves with people who agree with our conclusions, when we should be gravitating toward those who challenge our thought process. The result is

that our beliefs get brittle long before our bones. We think too much like preachers defending our sacred beliefs, prosecutors proving the other side wrong, and politicians campaigning for approval--and too little like scientists searching for truth. Intelligence is no cure, and it can even be a cu

rse: being good at thinking can make us worse at rethinking. The brighter we are, the blinder to our own limitations we can become. 　　Organizational psychologist Adam Grant is an expert on opening other people's minds--and our own. As Wharton's top-rated professor and the bestselling author of Orig

inals and Give and Take, he makes it one of his guiding principles to argue like he's right but listen like he's wrong. With bold ideas and rigorous evidence, he investigates how we can embrace the joy of being wrong, bring nuance to charged conversations, and build schools, workplaces, and communit

ies of lifelong learners. You'll learn how an international debate champion wins arguments, a Black musician persuades white supremacists to abandon hate, a vaccine whisperer convinces concerned parents to immunize their children, and Adam has coaxed Yankees fans to root for the Red Sox. Think Again

reveals that we don't have to believe everything we think or internalize everything we feel. It's an invitation to let go of views that are no longer serving us well and prize mental flexibility over foolish consistency. If knowledge is power, knowing what we don't know is wisdom.

論內線交易中偶然聽聞重大消息之消息受領人責任

為了解決Immunize的問題，作者周筠 這樣論述：

我國證券交易法第157條之1第1項第5款規定為：「五、從前四款所列之人獲悉消息之人。」惟，是否任何獲悉消息之人皆在本法所規定禁止之列，有所爭議，偶然聽聞(overhear)消息者在判決上有認定無罪，亦有認定有罪；因此格外需要釐清何謂「消息傳遞傳遞責任」(Tipper-Tippee Liability)，對於偶然聽聞要有一個統一之解釋。我國證券交易法為參照美國法1933年證券法(Securities Act of 1933)與1934年證券交易法(Securities Exchange Act of 1934)所訂定，故比較上會就消息受領人範圍與美國法相比擬。美國法消息傳遞責任是源自於忠實義務

理論(Fiduciary Duty Theory)，偶然聽聞消息者亦屬於消息傳遞責任一環；在判斷消息傳遞責任構成要件上，則是用1983年Dirks案之三要件：「1.消息傳遞人違反忠實義務而洩漏消息、2.消息受領人明知或可得而知消息傳遞人違反信賴義務、3.消息傳遞人因消息傳遞而受有利益 。」本文由消息傳遞責任之偶然聽聞所引發的問題意識，而我國證券交易法是否採取忠實義務理論之Dirks案三要件來判斷消息受領人責任？偶然聽聞消息者究竟該如何論斷？本文將以比較法來研究偶然聽聞之消息傳遞責任，先剖析內線交易之起源，再比較美國與我國之真實案例，同時參照學說觀點，最後建構出我國證券交易法中對於偶然聽聞重大消

息之消息受領人之範圍與責任。