LUXE vs IMAX的問題，透過圖書和論文來找解法和答案更準確安心。 我們找到下列線上看、影評和彩蛋懶人包

薩德的索多瑪120天，或者所有狀態下的自然：超越physis與metaphysis

為了解決LUXE vs IMAX的問題，作者強克 這樣論述：

This work on The 120 Days of Sodom, divided into three parts, is built around the key concept of nature addressed in relation with two other Greek concepts: physics (phusis) and metaphysics (metaphusis). In doing so, the thesis seeks to demonstrate that Sade exposes a radical conception of man―or r

adical anthropology―within his text; a conception based on a study of the passions—that is, as rooted into the Greek etymology, as pathology, the “science” of passions. Amongst all of this, there is also a political project. But this so-called scientific project challenges the idea of science as sys

tem.Sadean anthropology goes beyond traditional ontology, because it refuses theology or ontotheology. It also raises the question of teleology as it is posed in relation to the libertine discourse that makes evil the end (purpose) of human conduct, thereby undermining all ethics. This anthropology

is also presented as a pathology. As a result, nature in all its states, and particularly in The 120 Days, can be defined as the celebration of the senses. This debauchery of the senses is, in fact, the body in all its states. And it is precisely here that the political dimension of the novel raises

the question of domination and government of bodies. These appear, both passively and actively, as patients and agents—as would have been said in the eighteenth century. This body signifies the desired body, the narrated body, the mutilated body—in short, the dead body (killed) and the living body

that has been kept alive. However, it is also the experienced body. Hence the imperative to say that it all guides Sade, a kind of encyclopaedical will. A saying it all that is akin to a type of “inspection”, but which also provides the reader with a relative sense of freedom in this orgy of passion

s, presented as a culinary metaphor. Consequently, The 120 Days of Sodom—through the figure of the castle of Silling—poses both a geographical problem in the literal sense, but also in physiological and physical sense of the body as political territory. Hence the question of the conflict between uto

pia and heterotopia.A superficial reading of Sade’s novel would assign a heterotopic dimension to Silling. However, it is, in fact, a utopia: a real place of sovereignty and biopolitics. However, a heterotopia is possible if the reader chooses to participate in a conversion with the gaze on the side

of the victims. Finally, there is a dilemma between a utopian or heterotopic reading of Sade’s text―that is, the sovereignty or biopolitics reading of the novel.

時尚名牌精品業炫耀性消費行為之研究--以國際精品品牌為例

為了解決LUXE vs IMAX的問題，作者鄭錦英 這樣論述：

近幾年來，台灣的經濟進步快速，貧富間的差距也愈來愈大，社會結構已逐漸趨向「M型化社會」。然而，擁有時尚精品名牌商品仍是時下不少人的願望、夢想和犒賞自己的方式，享受奢華、炫耀性的消費，象徵個人具有相當身分、地位的消費能力，消費者更加重視如何消費得更有價值，於是漸漸形成「個人M型化消費」的現象。本研究認為順應未來的發展趨勢，炫耀性消費將會對時尚名牌精品業具有極大的影響力，是主要的研究動機。本研究為一探索性的研究，以「國際精品品牌」作為探討的個案，再經由相關文獻探討與消費者之訪談作為本研究的架構。研究方法是採質性與量化並進的方式分析研究資料，比較不同生活型態的市場區隔集群與不同消費者特性的消費行為

，分析時尚精品業之炫耀性消費行為與影響因素及購買動機之間的相關性，為主要研究目的。研究結論發現會影響炫耀性消費者願意消費的因素從消費者心理層面與外在情境的互動過程，都是影響消費者行為的因素。建議時尚精品業者在同業競爭的同時，彼此必須以良性的競爭，了解消費者之需求並以消費者為導向，為品牌企業之永續經營，提供時尚精品業者未來做為行銷商品時之品牌策略與推廣之參考。