韓劇電影你都看哪一部呢？論文書籍站
Ontological meaning的問題，透過圖書和論文來找解法和答案更準確安心。 我們找到下列線上看、影評和彩蛋懶人包
Ontological meaning的問題，我們搜遍了碩博士論文和台灣出版的書籍，推薦Youngblood Jackson, Alecia,Mazzei, Lisa A.寫的 Thinking with Theory in Qualitative Research: Viewing Data Across Multiple Perspectives 和PaulAllenMiller,AlexanderBeecroft,BennettYu-HsiangFu,NicolasVazs的 Digitalizing the Global Text：Philosophy, Literature, and Culture都 可以從中找到所需的評價。
這兩本書分別來自 和國立臺灣大學出版中心所出版 。
輔仁大學 哲學系 尤煌傑所指導 高浩容的 自我與存有——論羅洛・梅的存在心理治療 （2021），提出Ontological meaning關鍵因素是什麼，來自於存在心理治療、哲學治療、哲學諮商、人格、此有、此有分析、存在主義、羅洛・梅、田立克、海德格、賓斯萬格、博斯。
而第二篇論文國立政治大學 亞太研究英語碩士學位學程(IMAS) 吳考甯所指導 江薇的 現代化的尪公：歷史、象徵，及非人能動性 （2021），提出因為有 台灣、非人能動性、歷史、尪公、保儀大夫、民間宗教、儀式、人格性、新泛靈論的重點而找出了 Ontological meaning的解答。
Thinking with Theory in Qualitative Research: Viewing Data Across Multiple Perspectives
為了解決Ontological meaning 的問題，作者Youngblood Jackson, Alecia,Mazzei, Lisa A. 這樣論述：
Thinking with Theory in Qualitative Research: Second Edition demonstrates how to enact various philosophical concepts in practices of inquiry, effectively opening up the process of thought in qualitative studies.Thinking with Theory in Qualitative Research functions as a refusal of pregiven metho
d, intensifying creativity, experimentation, and newness. Readers are invited into the threshold of theory to traverse philosophers and their concepts, reorienting conventional approaches to inquiry. Each chapter presents a thinking with process as a way of reading intensively through plugging in pe
rformative accounts of two first-generation academic women to philosophical concepts from Derrida, Spivak, Foucault, Butler, Barad, and Deleuze and Guattari. This book is a deliberate attempt to unsettle what is expected to be represented or recognized in terms of both meaning and method in traditio
nal practices of qualitative research, which become unproductive and untenable in this different image of thought.New to this editionFully revised and rewritten Chapter 1 that introduces the technique of plugging in as contingent, strategic movements of thought. Also new to Chapter 1 is a shift in l
anguage away from traditional practices in qualitative research (data and analysis) to performative accounts and becoming-questionsFully revised ＂Thinking with intra-action＂ chapter, which focuses on Karen Barad’s ontoepistemological framework of agential realism, and the concepts of posthumanist pe
rformativity and entangled agenciesFully revised and rewritten Chapter 8 that presents plugging in and thinking with as ontologicalFurther development of and new material on the ＂plugging in＂ techniqueSchematic cues updated and extended for all of the InterludesIn the ten years since the first editi
on was published, Thinking with Theory in Qualitative Research has become a vanguard text in the field of postfoundational inquiry for its accessible but thorough introductions to philosophically informed inquiry. This book is for experienced and novice researchers, and students in introductory, gen
eral, and advanced qualitative inquiry courses, who may also be first-time readers of philosophy. This text will function as an entry into techniques of thinking with a new theoretical vocabulary.
自我與存有——論羅洛・梅的存在心理治療
為了解決Ontological meaning 的問題，作者高浩容 這樣論述：
本文旨在探討羅洛．梅融合存在哲學與心理學所建構的存在心理治療，藉以澄清人——這個不同於其它動物的存有——做爲會（且能）焦慮的個體，即澄清人之存有之內涵。其次，借鑑梅結合哲學與心理治療的學思歷程，嘗試透過梅的思維，藉以提供本土哲學治療在應用的實務層面之上，結合心理諮商，擬給予心理治療實踐者新的視域。本論文之方法論，主要採用詮釋學和系譜學，藉其特殊性結合研究主題並予以深度對話，進而析論存在心理治療如何在梅的開展下，得以建構出一門調和融會哲學與心理諮商的系統。存在心理治療之發展歷程以梅《存在》一書引入「此有分析」為界分為前、後期。前期，梅從精神分析的學習者，通過吸收田立克對「存有」與「非存有」的哲
學觀，扭轉了他的人學觀，遂捨棄當時心理學主流的精神分析病理觀，乃由傾向心理學的人格論轉向存有學的自我論。梅於自我論的發展中，意識到純粹的存有學探討無法滿足治療的需要，進而經由賓斯萬格與博斯轉化自海德格的「此有分析」哲學理論為心理治療的理論，做為其在實踐場域的參考。這一路徑轉向，使存有學關於自我的探討，到治療中治療師與來談者之間的聯繫互動有了依據。於後期，梅完成了存在心理治療的存有學學說，並結合臨床治療形成今日存在心理治療的三個理論內核：一、存在心理治療將自我視為「在世存有」。二、人的存在困境在於人總處於存在的兩難困境之中，必須藉由非存有的威脅，方能開顯其存有。三、治療是通過治療師與來談者在場之
會心，使人還原自我之存有本真性。最後，通過對存在心理治療辯證發展歷程之探究，我們發現融入哲學視角，可比一般實證心理科學其心理治療情境中，呈顯更為深邃且獨特不同的運作方式：通過以存有學為基礎貫通至經驗世界的人學觀，使治療師能在治療中保有對人的整全認識，避免治療中對來談者的物化，或施展獨斷的病理診斷，以求幫助來談者不只是解決眼前的心理困惑，更能實現其自我的本真面目。
Digitalizing the Global Text：Philosophy, Literature, and Culture
為了解決Ontological meaning 的問題，作者PaulAllenMiller,AlexanderBeecroft,BennettYu-HsiangFu,NicolasVazs 這樣論述：
A few years ago globalism seemed to be both a known and inexorable phenomenon. With the end of the Cold War, the opening of the Chinese economy, and the ascendancy of digital technology, the prospect of a unified flow of goods and services and of people and ideas seemed unstoppable. Yes,
there were pockets of resistance and reaction, but these, we were told, would be swept away in a relentless tide of free markets and global integration that would bring Hollywood, digital fi nance, and fast food to all. Nonetheless, we have begun to experience the backlash against a global world
founded on digital fungibility, and the perils of appeals to nationalism, identity, and authenticity have become only too apparent. The anxieties and resentments produced by this new world order among those left behind are oft en manifested in assertions of xenophobia and particularity. The “other”
is coming to take what is ours, and we must defend ourselves! Digitalizing the Global Text is a collection of essays by an international group of scholars that situate themselves squarely at this nexus of forces. Together they examine how literature, culture, and philosophy in the global and dig
ital age both enable the creation of these simultaneously utopian and dystopian worlds and offer resistance to them. 好評推薦 “Digitalizing the Global Text is a vibrant volume that explores the paradoxes of the local, the global, and the universal, with particular emphasis on the digital humanities.
This wonderful collection of essays from an accomplished global group of contributors will be of wide interest to humanities scholars.”--- Jeffrey R. Di Leo, University of Houston–Victoria “Traversing historical periods and national boun d aries, with topics ranging from Plato to ‘Gang nam Style
,’ the essays in Digitalizing the Global Text represent a vast array of perspectives while resisting the tendency to fetishize or hype the global. This collection represents a major contribution to the study of world literatures and cultures.”--- ROBERT T. TALLY JR., Texas State University “Digit
alizing the Global Text is a splendid contribution to the ongoing work of challenging globalism. Refusing to settle for its dominant neoliberal form, marked by the digitization of knowledge and homogenization of cultural production, this volume pursues alternative forms of life—recalcitrant ones—tha
t do not sacrifice the singularities of the local in their illustration and enactment of the global.”--- ZAHI ZALLOUA, Whitman College “Digitalizing the Global Text stages a crucial intervention into discussions and debates around globalization and digitalization. How can we begin to imagine anew
a globalization and a digital sphere that do not merely translate into capitalist profiteering? This is the crucial question at once asked and answered by this collection.”--- CHRISTOPHER BREU, author of Insistence of the Material “This is a timely and forthright collection on what happens to th
e cultural within forms of globalization and globality. Essays address not just the impact of popular culture but also attempt to understand how thinking itself is recalibrated between the shifting scales of local and global. A template for global cultural critique.”--- PETER HITCHCOCK, Baruch Colle
ge, City University of New York
現代化的尪公：歷史、象徵，及非人能動性
為了解決Ontological meaning 的問題，作者江薇 這樣論述：
近年來，一個名為「尪公巡田園」的宗教農業活動，在臺灣臺北重新得到人們的關注。這個活動是由當地企業、政府機關，以及傳統寺廟合作舉辦。在十八世紀時，來自中國福建的移民將神明「尪公」帶到臺北。早期的移民們往往會祈求尪公的庇佑，以擴大他們的土地開墾面積，並保護農作收成。到了十九世紀中葉，臺灣的商業、政治中心漸漸從南方轉移到北方，尪公信仰在當時顯得愈發重要。隨著十九世紀的全球茶葉貿易熱潮，臺灣以出口導向為主的茶產業推動了臺灣的發展，並走向現代化。經過政權更迭，臺灣當地神明一度被邊緣化，然而時至今日，尪公又重新成為臺北重要的開基神祇。 在過去，尪公和祂的信眾們塑造了農業和商業的盛況。如今，後工業時代下
的城市經濟主要是透過房地產開發而活絡。近年來重新舉辦的「尪公巡田園」活動，不僅讓人們得以回顧臺北曾經的農業發展，也引起人們開始關注當地農業的現況。以這種方式呈現的尪公信仰，就如同臺北的農業一樣，成為了歷史的一部份，並以文化資產的形式保存下來。另一方面，如今仍然定期參拜尪公的當地信眾，則認為尪公是幫助他們解決生活中實際問題的神明。雖然這些信眾不再仰賴農業維生，而大多是從事房地產開發或是服務業。在他們心目中，尪公仍然能夠協助人們解決現代社會中的種種問題。