Vulgarities的問題，透過圖書和論文來找解法和答案更準確安心。 我們找到下列線上看、影評和彩蛋懶人包

Blood and Oil: Mohammed bin Salman’s Quest to Become the Most Powerful Man in the World (International)

為了解決Vulgarities的問題，作者Bradley Hope,Justin Scheck 這樣論述：

　　暢銷書《鯨吞億萬》共同作者布萊利‧霍普、《華爾街日報》獲獎記者賈斯汀‧沙克與聯手著述！ 　　沙烏地阿拉伯王儲穆罕默德．本．沙爾曼，何以年僅35歲即威震全球？ 　　沙烏地阿拉伯王儲穆罕默德．本．沙爾曼(經常被媒體稱為MBS)的崛起，震撼了世界。各國政府與企業領導人如英國前首相布萊爾、奮進集團首席執行長伊曼紐等政商名流，不辭辛勞，大老遠飛到沙烏地阿拉伯與之會面後，紛紛讚賞王儲對改革遵循嚴格伊斯蘭律法的制度、提升女權的決心。而他也確實著手鬆綁規範，開放在矽谷進行投資、解除女性駕駛禁令。 　　然而他深受愛戴，卻也頗具爭議，曾被指控謀劃暗殺《華盛頓郵報》記者賈邁勒．卡舒吉，也曾為剷除異己而軟禁大

批權貴與皇室成員。其生活之奢華，也令人歎為觀止，譬如他曾買下7千萬美元的城堡及世界最昂貴的遊艇之一。儘管外界言論不斷，但他卻依然故我，似乎完全不在意他人的眼光。 　　本書是對於這位世界上最有權勢也最危險的新任領導者之一，深入調查、剖析的精彩作品。兩位作者呈現出在美國、沙烏地阿拉伯因石油與軍備的矛盾，已經糾結了80幾年的背景下，MBS如何驟然崛起，讓銀行大亨、好萊塢巨星、政壇老手與新星等全球政商名流，紛紛拜倒在他的魅力之下，爭相討好這位炙手可熱的王儲，並解析在本就充滿動盪的中東地區，如今加上充滿野心、權勢與手段的王儲，更添變數，MBS在掌權與大刀闊斧的改革之路的成敗，極有可能對全球帶來哪些巨大

影響。(文/博客來編譯) 　　Longlisted for the 2020 Financial Times / McKinsey Business Book of the Year   　　"Blood and Oil is the fascinating and highly entertaining tale of Mohammed bin Salman's rise to power. With fly-on-the-wall reporting and palace intrigue worthy of Machiavelli, it will keep you tu

rning the pages at a fast clip until its tragic denouement. And more importantly, it will leave you with a deep and nuanced understanding of the Crown Prince's thinking and its implications for Saudi Arabia and the entire Middle East." - John Carreyrou, author of Bad Blood 　　 　　Thirty-five-year-

old Mohammed bin Salman's sudden rise stunned the world. Political and business leaders such as former Prime Minister Tony Blair and WME Chairman Ari Emanuel flew out to meet with the Crown Prince and came away convinced that his desire to reform the kingdom was sincere. He spoke passionately about

bringing women into the workforce and toning down Saudi Arabia's restrictive Islamic law. He lifted the ban on women driving and explored investments in Silicon Valley.   　　But 'MBS' began to betray an erratic interior beneath the polish laid on by scores of consultants and public relations expe

rts like McKinsey & Company. The allegations of excess and about the brutality of his regime began to slip out. Then there was the assassination of journalist Jamal Khashoggi. While stamping out dissent in the Saudi royal family by holding three hundred members in the Ritz-Carlton Hotel for months,

he continued to exhibit his extreme wealth, including the purchase of a ＄70 million chateau in Europe and one of the world's most expensive yachts. It seemed that he did not understand nor care about how the outside world would react to his flexing of autocratic muscle.   　　"This is as close to

the truth, to the real story of the corruption, vulgarities, horrors, and lies of the Kingdom and its current despot as we are likely to get. It also can be read as a Shakespearean story of utter greed." - Seymour Hersh, author of Chain of Command

Vulgarities進入發燒排行的影片

《射鵰英雄傳一》兩個英譯本的比較: 翻譯策略與目的論研究

為了解決Vulgarities的問題，作者林蔓蓉 這樣論述：

射鵰英雄傳的英譯本於 2018 年由英國 MacLehose 出版社出版，這是首次有非學術的出版社發行金庸的鉅作。本論文由廖柏森教授整理之目的論出發，比較射鵰英雄傳一的兩個英譯本:其一是 MacLehose 版本，譯者為 Anna Holmwood。其二是在網路上流傳的版本，譯者皆為網友。MacLehose 版本的發行屬於商業行為，而另一版本卻明文禁止商業發行。基於兩個版本目的相左，本研究遂假設在相較之下，MacLehose版本會更傾向歸化譯法，以追求更高的讀者接受度。經數據分析後本研究的假設得經證實: 宏觀而言，MacLehose 版本在篇幅上刪除了一些次要情節段落，較另一版本來得更歸化。

微觀而言，MacLehose 版本在姓名、綽號、帶有文化詞的成語套句上來說，歸化程度亦較高。兩個版本的歸化程度在次要情節段落上差距明顯最大，接下來依序排列是姓名、綽號、帶有文化詞的成語套句。從帶有文化詞的成語套句在歸化程度上差距最小這點可見，(武俠)文化詞正在東風西漸。拜全球化之賜，文化的飛速傳播也日漸縮減譯者在歸化和異化的兩難。本論文是從目的論的視角比較兩個翻譯版本的歸化程度，而不是獨立討論MacLehose 版本。最後，對於 MacLehose 版本的人名翻譯，本研究試著總結出一些規律: 1. 對於小人物的名字，MacLehose 版本傾向不處理其文化意涵，直接音譯。2. 對於較重要的人物

，MacLehose 版傾向翻譯出其名字文化意涵，如果人名沒有強烈暗示該人物的特性，MacLehose 版本便運用歸化手法，替該人物取一個能帶給讀者相關聯想的西洋名。3. 同門或是團體譯法大多一致。關鍵詞: 射鵰英雄傳、目的論、歸化、異化、金庸、翻譯策略

Martin Luther’s The Church Held Captive in Babylon: Latin-English Edition, with a New Translation and Introduction

為了解決Vulgarities的問題，作者Janz, Denis R. 這樣論述：

In August of 1520, Martin Luther published the first of three incendiary works, Address to the German Nobility, in which he urged secular authorities to take a strong hand in "reforming" the Roman church. In October, he published The Church Held Captive, and by December the deepest theological rati

onale appeared in The Freedom of a Christian. With these three books, the relatively unknown Friar Martin exploded onto the Western European literary and religious scene. These three works have been universally acknowledged as classics of the Reformation, and of the Western religious tradition in ge

neral. Though Reformation scholars have been reluctant to single out one as the most important of the three, Denis Janz proposes a bold case for The Church Held Captive. In the first entirely new translation in more than a century, Janz presents Luther's text as it hasn't been read in English before

. Previous translations stifle the original text by dulling the sharpest edges of its argumentation and tame Luther by substituting euphemisms for his vulgarities. In Janz's dual language edition we see the provocative, offensive, and extreme restored. In his wide-ranging introduction, Janz offers m

uch-needed context to clarify the role of The Church Held Captive in Luther's life and the life of the Reformation. This edition is the most reader-friendly scholarly version of Luther's classic in the English language. Denis Janz grew up in Western Canada and completed his Ph.D. in the history of

Christianity at St. Michael’s College in the University of Toronto. He served as Provost Distinguished Professor of Religious Studies at Loyola University New Orleans, and was promoted to Professor Emeritus in 2017. His teaching, writing, and editing has covered the entire history of Christianity,

while his most exacting research has focused on medieval and Reformation topics, above all Luther.

《犯罪現場》第三季鑑識用語翻譯研究

為了解決Vulgarities的問題，作者吳又融 這樣論述：

術語代表專門知識。主題式專業影集字幕不僅是語言文化的橋梁，也是影集中專門知識傳播的管道。字幕譯者必需在有限的時間及空間裡，讓一般觀眾理解字幕與專門用語意義，並充分掌握劇情脈動。在《犯罪現場 (Crime Scene Investigation, CSI)》這部演繹鑑識科學協助偵破刑事案件的影集裡，字幕中有許多不精準的鑑識用語漢譯，其影響不能等閒視之，恐有阻礙國人鑑識知識傳播，造成鑑識水平低落，產生影響司法正義之負面CSI效應。然而，國內卻少有學者著手研究《犯罪現場》鑑識用語漢譯的良莠。本文以學者黃河清 (1995) 的研究及傳統漢語外來詞分類方式，先行分析實務界鑑識用語的漢譯方式，分為譯義法

、譯音法、借入法、兼用詞等四大類；並以西方著名的翻譯學領域學者奈達 (Nida) 的對等理論、紐馬克 (Newmark) 的實用翻譯法及溫努提 (Venuti) 的歸化及異化策略，來探討國內鑑識用語的翻譯方針。之後，筆者立基於學者Matamala (2009a; 2009b; 2010) 之研究，以《犯罪現場》第三季23集為研究材料，探討字幕中的鑑識專門用語翻譯問題；將字幕裡不理想的鑑識用語漢譯分為「無法辨識鑑識用語」、「不同對應名詞的選擇」、「無法找到正確對應的中文鑑識用語」、「無法正確理解鑑識用語」及「選擇學術名詞或通俗用語」等樣態，從鑑識實務角度切入，評析並提供建議譯法。研究結果顯示，國

內常見之漢譯鑑識用語，以保留英文鑑識用語詞序為基礎，在漢語讀者閱讀習性的考量下，將不理想漢譯鑑識用語樣態的起因做了一個結論，即：字幕譯者對鑑識用語的指涉概念理解不足。筆者建議：選用以讀者或閱聽人為中心之既有漢譯鑑識用語從事各類翻譯工作，始能有效傳播鑑識科學知識，提升國民鑑識素養，實踐國家司法正義。