r one的問題，透過圖書和論文來找解法和答案更準確安心。 我們找到下列線上看、影評和彩蛋懶人包

What Is Life Worth?: The Inside Story of the 9/11 Fund and Its Effort to Compensate the Victims of September 11th

為了解決r one的問題，作者Feinberg, Kenneth R. 這樣論述：

Kenneth R. Feinberg, one of the nation’s leading lawyers, has been front and center in some of the most complex public legal disputes of the past three decades: Agent Orange, asbestos, the closing of the Shoreham Nuclear Plant, and now, 9/11. A former prosecutor and member of two Presidential Commis

sions, he is also adjunct Professor of Law at Georgetown University, the University of Pennsylvania, Columbia University, and New York University. He lives in Washington D.C.

r one進入發燒排行的影片

沙氏法對收益結構和績效之影響：臺灣會計師產業的證據

為了解決r one的問題，作者陳劍雄 這樣論述：

美國於2002年7月發布沙氏法案(The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, SOX)，SOX法案及其精神導致會計師產業發生重大變化。本文探討SOX與會計師產業收益結構和績效之關聯性，使用臺灣「1992-2019年會計師事務所服務業調查報告」的22,356筆觀察資料，透過收益函數來探討SOX對會計師產業之總收益、傳統服務份額、稅務服務份額和管理諮詢服務份額之影響。同時，本研究依樣本類型分為小型、中型、大型和國際型會計師事務所，從經濟管制理論(Theory of Economic Regulation, TER)的角度，考察SOX管制制度對會計師事務所績效之影響。我們運用會

計師產業的translog收益函數，並建立了迴歸方程式來檢驗我們的假說。本研究發現SOX法案對非國際型會計師事務所的收益產生了消極影響，但對國際型會計師事務所的收益產生了積極影響。SOX法案增加了非國際型會計師事務所的稅務服務份額，同時也增加了國際型會計師事務所的稅務服務份額。此外，我們還發現SOX法案對四種不同規模的會計師事務所的經營績效都存在正向影響。進一步的結果表明，在SOX管制之下，大型和國際型會計師事務所直接獲得了管制的利益(直接管制效應)，小型和中型事務所間接獲得管制的利益(間接管制效應)。本研究有助於文獻研究，為監管機構完善會計師事務所管理提供啟示。

Sports Law

為了解決r one的問題，作者Gardiner, Simon/ Boyes, Simon/ O’Leary, John/ Naidoo, Urvasi 這樣論述：

Long established as the market leading textbook on sports law, this new edition continues to offer a comprehensive and authoritative examination of the legal issues surrounding and governing sport. Alert to the role that sport plays within society throughout, this edition is divided into four core P

arts: Governance & Sport, Commercial Regulation, Sports Workplace and Safety in Sport. Written by eminent experts in the field, this book is the go-to resource for academics teaching and researching sports law. The book will use carefully selected extracts to provide students with a contextual under

standing of each topic, while offering clear avenues for further reading and research.Sports law is an optional module, which is most commonly taught in the second and third year of the LLB. It is a fast-growing subject, with student numbers averaging around 50 per year. There are also a variety of

smaller markets for the textbook, including sport and leisure students, and professionals working in sports law and the wider sports industries.Issues covered in this edition include: A concise discussion of the theoretical understanding of the regulation of sport in the context of its history and c

ulture in the UKThe question of nationality, team quotas and the relationship with European employment lawEU compaction law interaction with sport under articles 81/82 EU.The World Anti-Doping Agency code in the context of recent and on-going casesanalysis of recent Court of Arbitration for Sport ju

risprudenceThe increasing occurrence of ADR mechanisms in resolving sporting disputesAn expanded chapter on IP law in sport using London 2012 as a case studyissues around the commercialisation of sportAnti-discrimination provisions in sportGreater recourse to law for participant violence within the

sporting arena Simon Boyes is a Senior Lecturer at Nottingham Law School, Nottingham Trent University. He teaches on Nottingham Law School’s LLM Sports Law, as well as its Sports Law module on the undergraduate law programme. His primary research interests are in the self-regulatory aspects of sp

ort and their relationship with the law. He also has an interest in the relationship between sport and the European Union. Most of his recent published work is in this area, including, ’One Size Fits All? The Myth of a Homogenous European Sports Law’ [2006] 1-2 International Sports Law Journal 16 an

d ’Caught Behind or Following-On? Cricket, the European Union and the ＂Bosman Effect＂’ [2005] 3 Entertainment and Sports Law Journal. Simon Gardiner is a Reader in Sports Law at Leeds Metropolitan University and Senior Research Fellow at the Asser International Sports Law Centre. His particular rese

arch interests include sports governance, racism and the construction of national identity in sport. He has published widely in a number of areas of sports law. He is co-editor of EU, Sport, Law and Policy: Regulation, Re-regulation and Representation, 2nd. ed. (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2009) (with Pa

rrish, R & Siekmann, R.), and author of ’UK Sports Law’ in Blanpain, R & Hendrickx, F (eds.) International Encyclopaedia of Sports Law (The Hague: Kluwer, 2008). He is editor of the Sport and the Law Journal and on the editorial board of the International Sports Law Journal.Urvasi Naidoo is a sports

lawyer who previously worked for the Salt Lake Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games 2002 in the Brand Protection Department and the International Cricket Council as their In House Lawyer. She is currently employed as the Chief Executive Officer of the International Federation of Netball Associations

.　　 She is a Trustee to Sporting Equals, the only organisation working across the UK to promote opportunities for black and ethnic minorities in sport and physical activity and sits on the Commission for the Future of Women’s Sports. She has published a number of sports law articles and is a regular

speaker/ guest lecturer on her specialist topics: Ambush Marketing, Brand Protection, Constitutional and Regulatory Matters, Dispute Resolution, Disciplinary Measures, Anti Corruption, Sport and Corporate Social Responsibility and Contract. Her interest in the Olympic movement saw her volunteer at

Athens 2004 and Vancouver 2010 and she is down to volunteer again at London 2012.John O’Leary is a Senior Lecturer in Law and member of the International Law Unit at Anglia Ruskin University. He has written extensively and published widely in the areas of doping, stadium safety and sports contracts.

He acts as a consultant to sports governing bodies, was co-author of a report on doping for the European Commission and has advised UK Anti-Doping on Legal aspects of anti-doping regulation. He is editor of Drugs and Doping in Sport: Socio-Legal Perspectives (2000, Cavendish Publishing).Roger Welch

is a visiting research fellow at the University of Portsmouth. His research interests are primarily in the areas of employment law, trade unions rights and sports law, and he has published widely in these areas. His publications in sports law include: ’A Snort and a Puff: Recreational Drugs and Dis

cipline in Professional Sport’, in O’ Leary (ed), Drugs and Doping in Sport, (2001, Cavendish); 　’Player Mobility, the FIFA Transfer Rules and Freedom of Movement’ International Sports Law Review, 2006; ’The Contractual Dynamics of Team Stability Versus Player Mobility: Who Rules ’The Beautiful Game

’? Entertainment and Sports Law Journal, 2007 (with S Gardiner); ’Football, Racism and the Limits of ’Colour Blind’ Law Revisited’, in Burdsey, D. (ed), Ethnicity and Football: Persisting Debates and Emergent Issues (2011, Routledge) (with Simon Gardiner); ’Bosman - There and Back Again: the Legitim

acy of Playing Quotas under European Union Sports Policy’, European Law Journal, 2011, (with Simon Gardiner).

父母親身體狀況與嬰幼兒先天性缺陷之關聯性研究

為了解決r one的問題，作者陳悠祈 這樣論述：

隨著社會經濟壓力逐漸增大，晚婚生子成了趨勢。根據內政部人口統計，西元2019年台灣女性生育第一胎年齡在35歲以上者高達23％，約為西元2009年的2.4倍。高齡產婦的增加，導致妊娠糖尿病、羊水過多、懷孕引起之高血壓等妊娠風險上升，進而造成出生兒的先天性缺陷風險增加。近來，商業保險中的婦嬰險推展，不僅提供產婦保障，同時為新生兒帶來保障。且因應客戶需求，不再侷限於孩子一兩年短期的保障，也觀察其多年後的情形，加強對特定先天缺陷及相關住院、手術醫療面的給付。此外，一般保險公司在提供此保障時，產婦需要填寫健康告知聲明書，藉此預測未來承保的風險，然而父親對嬰幼兒先天缺陷隱含的潛在危險因子可能仍需

再列入考量。因此本研究期望透過「衛生福利部衛生福利資料科學中心」所提供之資料，藉由廣義線性模型，探討2004年至2017年0-7歲嬰幼兒之先天缺陷與父母親危險因子的關聯性。 研究顯示，觀察西元2004年至2017年的2,326,774位新生兒，其0-7歲罹患先天缺陷的機率為4.067%，當中約有20%的先天缺陷者於2歲後才發覺。在其他條件皆相同之下，父親年齡、母親年齡增加十歲時，則會分別使嬰幼兒其先天缺陷率提高為原本的1.013倍（95%CI=0.995-1.031）、1.185倍（95%CI=1.162-1.209）。而母親有任一懷孕危險因子所生育的嬰幼兒其先天缺陷率(例如:心臟疾病、

孕期抽煙、妊娠糖尿病)則是母親無任一懷孕危險因子的1.144倍（95%CI=0.995-1.314）-2.003倍（95%CI=1.932-2.077）之間。希望藉由本研究所得先天缺陷相關資訊，提供保險公司作為訂價上風險的評估，也使雙親藉由事先瞭解懷孕的危險因子能有效做好相關的預防措施，在生育的路上更加順利。